This wasted money on cannabis video short is the behind the scenes cannabis video fail that spawned an entire redo. While testing 80 proof versus 190 proof alcohol for cannabis tincture extraction, the jars got mixed up mid-shoot — and what seemed like a complete video turned out to be unusable. The result: roughly $100 of cannabis, alcohol, and time down the drain. Here are the 5 hard lessons from that expensive mistake, useful for anyone making cannabis content or doing at-home cannabis experiments.
What Happened: The $100 Behind the Scenes Cannabis Video Fail
The plan was straightforward — a side-by-side comparison of 80 proof and 190 proof alcohol for cannabis tincture extraction, tested with a TCheck potency meter. The cannabis was decarbed, measured, and split into two jars. Both were shaken for the same amount of time. The TCheck tests were run. But somewhere in the middle of filming — while high — the jars were mixed up. The 190 proof results were recorded as 80 proof results, and vice versa. The whole video had to be scrapped and reshot the next day. This is the wasted money on cannabis video short that warned viewers before the redo video dropped.
Wasted Money on Cannabis Video Short: 5 Hard Lessons
Lesson 1: Label Everything Before You Start
The single root cause of this behind the scenes cannabis video fail was unlabeled jars. Both jars looked identical after being filled. A piece of tape and a marker would have prevented the entire mistake. Whenever you are running a comparison experiment — especially one involving cannabis — label every container before adding anything to it. Do not wait until after filling.
Lesson 2: Do Not Film Science Experiments While High
Cannabis content creation mistakes often come from the obvious irony of being high while making educational cannabis content. For recreational videos, being high on camera is fine — it is part of the vibe. But for controlled experiments that require tracking multiple variables (jar A vs jar B, weight A vs weight B, result A vs result B), sobriety matters. The redo video was filmed sober specifically to prevent a repeat of the confusion.
Lesson 3: Cannabis Video Production Cost Lessons Add Up Fast
The cannabis video production cost lessons from this episode: materials for comparison experiments are not free. Each test used 5 grams of cannabis and 200 milliliters of quality alcohol per jar. Multiply by two for the failed first attempt and the successful redo, and the material cost alone approaches $100. For creators running potency tests, equipment tests, or recipe experiments, failed shoots are expensive. Budget for failure — especially early in the experiment learning curve.
Lesson 4: Test the Source Material First
In the failed first video, the cannabis was not potency-tested before the experiment began. In the successful redo, the flower was TCheck-tested raw first, logging a 14.6% THC baseline. This baseline is what made the final extraction results meaningful — without knowing the source potency, the mg/ml extraction numbers have no context. If you want to know how to make better cannabis content involving testing, start with a baseline measurement before the experiment begins.
Lesson 5: Transparency Builds Trust
Rather than quietly editing the failed video with text corrections or burying the mistake in the description, this wasted money on cannabis video short was published openly — explaining exactly what went wrong and why the redo was needed. This approach to cannabis content creation mistakes builds more trust with viewers than pretending errors never happen. Audiences respect honesty, especially when it costs the creator money and time to fix it properly.
The Redo Video
The corrected version of the 80 proof vs 190 proof alcohol tincture comparison is also on the channel. It includes pre-experiment cannabis potency testing, clearly labeled jars, and sober execution — and it shows that 190 proof alcohol extracts more than double the THC per milliliter compared to 80 proof under identical conditions. If you want the actual data, watch that video. This wasted money on cannabis video short exists as the honest prequel to that cleaner result.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does it actually cost to make cannabis content?
Cannabis video production cost lessons vary widely by content type. A simple smoke session video costs the price of the cannabis used. A comparison experiment like the 80 vs 190 proof test can cost $50–$150 in materials per attempt — more if specialized equipment like a TCheck potency meter is involved. Failed cannabis content creation mistakes multiply those costs. Over time, labels, sober filming, and pre-testing save significant money.
How do you avoid making mistakes in cannabis experiment videos?
The core of how to make better cannabis content for experiments: label everything before filling it, film sober when precision matters, test your baseline materials first, and write down all measurements immediately rather than relying on memory. These habits eliminate most behind the scenes cannabis video fail scenarios before they happen.
References
Learn More on Herbistry420
Purchase Links
Support Herbistry420 by visiting our Cannabis Apparel Store, we have t-shirts, hoodies, pants, towels, you name it!
Note: Some links are affiliate links. Purchases through these links support the channel at no extra cost to you.
Add comment